The treason of the liberals
If it is proved that the Oklahoma bombing was the work of
white, un-hyphenated Americans, the act may be a harbinger
of a growing general rage at the depredations, both moral and
material, made on the mass of their respective publics by
liberal elites throughout the western world.
For more than half a century these elites have acted
ruthlessly to enforce an ideology which is utterly at odds
with human nature and doomed by its very tenets to produce,
in the course of a generation or two, immense social ills
which, because of the liberal mentality, are incompetently
addressed by ever more bad, inequitable and restrictive
laws and increasingly burdensome government.
During their period of ascendency liberals have acted
consistently and maliciously against the interests of those
who form the social bedrock of their various nations.
Throughout the western world, if you are white, male and
indubitably attached by birth and upbringing to your country
and culture, watch out buster because your politicians,
laws, legal system, bureaucracy, educationalists and mass
media are energetically opposed to your interests. In
particular, if you happen to be an instinctive white
patriot in what might loosely be termed the Anglo-Saxon
cultures - Britain, the USA, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand - then God help you because your own ruling class
most certainly will not.
How have liberals brought the West to this unhappy state? By
granting legal and de facto privileges to particular races,
cultures and women; by an incessant denigration through the
media, education and politics of the culture and values of
their majority populations; by the remorseless promotion of
multiculturalism; by the crippling of public education
through the use of "progressive" educational theory to
indoctrinate teachers with impractical and inherently
destructive teaching practices and ideas which emphasise
rights above duties and actively disparage the acquisition
of knowledge and intellectual competence; by the promotion
of supranational bodies such as the UN at the expense of the
nation (what a wonderful toy for every malevolent dictator is
the UN); by, above all, the celebration of pseudo-victims -
the unable, the unskilled, the uneducated, the stupid, the
feckless, the idle, the gratuitously violent, the amoral, the
society hating - at the expense of the skilled, the able, the
educated, the honest, the moral, the self-supporting, the
self-respecting, the peaceable, the patriotic.
The task of the liberal has been greatly eased, particularly
in those countries which previously enjoyed great racial and
cultural homogeneity, by both a deliberate dilution of the
majority populations through immigration policies which
discriminate against those settlers who would most easily
integrate into the cultural mainstream and by a refusal to
enforce effective measures against illegal immigrants, who
are overwhelmingly drawn from those peoples which are most
alien to the traditions of the majority populations of the
recipient countries. These actions of commission and omission
have a happy consequence for the liberal elite for once an
immigrant group reaches a good size - say 50,000 - it becomes
virtually impossible for any government with any pretensions
to maintaining personal freedoms and equality before the
law to enforce a meaningful immigration policy towards that
group because by then it represents a very real threat, both
in terms of its ability to pursue legal action against the
government on behalf of thwarted immigrants and by an ever
present threat of disorder ranging from rowdy demonstrations
to calculated violence. The term fifth column is used
disparagingly by liberals but that is what any sizeable
immigrant group which cannot or will not integrate
necessarily becomes. The whole business is made more certain
by the widespread liberal control of the mass media.
In their results the effects of the liberal elites'
immigration policies are indistinguishable from treason
because mass immigration which results in the formation of
ghettoes - and mass immigration of particular racial and
cultural groups invariably creates ghettoes - is equivalent
to settlement by conquest accompanied by an ethnic cleansing
of the original inhabitants. It is in fact conquest by other
means. The full enormity of these immigration policies can
be seen if we pose a question: suppose a government agreed
to cede - without any threat whatsoever from a foreign power
- part of its territory whilst leaving the inhabitants of
that territory utterly to the mercies of a foreign power,
what would it be reasonable to call such an act? I suggest
the most high treason as the only appropriate phrase. If
immigrant groups are fifth columnists, the liberal elites
represent a sixth column.
In truth, modern liberalism is a crude fantasy built on the
absurd premise that men are essentially the same and may live
in harmony regardless of massive differences in culture and
Man's innate tribalism. That much beloved liberal ideal - the
multicultural, multiracial society - is a literal nonsense.
Without a shared culture and instinctive sense of identity
you have no more than an empire, which is essentially a
series of competing national ghettoes. The multiracial
state is a practical possibility: a multiracial nation a
contradiction in terms.
I said at the beginning that the liberal elites act
maliciously. Perhaps it might be better to say that they act
as every selfish aristocracy has acted since time began:
their natural instinct is to ignore the interests of the
mass of those they rule. Concerned only with the satisfaction
of their own desires; always confident that they may escape
the unpleasant consequences of their actions - which the poor
are forced to bear - by their wealth, social position and
political power; protected from frequent, powerful and
coherent criticism through their control of the mass media;
emotionally bolstered by hyperbolically false claims to a
moral superiority; always able to browbeat and control
political opponents by either excluding them from the media
or by turning them into "useful idiots" who are allowed just
enough exposure to permit the liberal media to claim, at
least to its own satisfaction, that it is "balanced" , they
are become as replete with stupid arrogance as the later
Bourbons, the stench of their gross hypocrisy matched only
by the rankness of their moral humbug, humbug which is
epitomised so sweetly in Clinton's words after the bombing:
"We still will have freedom of speech, we'll have freedom of
association, we'll have freedom of movement, but we may have
to have some discipline in doing it so we can go after people
who want to destroy our very way of life. (Translation: we
will curtail all these activities, as far as the Supreme
Court will allow us, for those people of whom liberals
disapprove. Thank your lucky stars, Americans, that you have
a constitutional right to freedom of expression and the
bearing of arms. Without those bulwarks, the liberal triumph
in America would be near complete and unassailable because of
the absence of disciplined national political parties). And
don't you just love that "people who want to destroy our way
of life" from a man who supports an ideology and practices
which are all about doing precisely that for the majority of
Americans?
Perhaps the Oklahoma bombing is the first sign that the
majority populations of the West are close to rebellion. In
Britain and the continent of Europe the immediate catalyst
to revolt will be the still untrammelled arrogance of the
various national liberal elites who have made not merely
common cause in their sympathies, but created a commonalty
of formal power within the ever more oppressive and
expensive European Union. In the USA, Canada, Australia and
New Zealand, the first engine of change will be provincial
revolt against national governments. But all western peoples
will be driven by the same basic ills: an arrogant, selfish
and incompetent ruling elite, patently unfair laws and
systems of justice, overburdensome government, frighteningly
high taxation, privileges granted to minorities and, most
fundamental and intractable, the creation, by selective
immigration policies (official and unofficial) and the
promotion of multiculturalism, of countries which are no
longer nations but empires. Of all the cruelties inflicted
upon the masses by liberals, the denial of the security of
racial and cultural homogeneity is the greatest for without
that a nation's privacy is lost. It is this sense of
belonging, this tribal feeling, which liberals have
fractured.
Terrible as the death of those in Oklahoma City was, let it
serve as a warning shot to the liberal elites to abdicate
and as a beacon to draw those who have seen the strange
perverted political creed that is modern liberalism in its
true lights into the legitimate political process. If the
bombing had been undertaken by, say, negro political
activists, the American liberal elite would be in paroxysms
of the exquisite self-indulgent self-hatred from which the
liberal obtains so much joy. Loud would be the cries for
"dialogue" with the "Afro-American community". Lavish would
be the calls for financial redress of their "grievances",
which in a manner unknown to moral philosophers date back to
generations long since dead and whose burdens of atonement
fall upon the shoulders of the blameless. How much more cause
is there to bring into the political process those who are
instinctive American patriots?
Will the lesson of Oklahoma City be learned? Probably not for
ruling elites of any political colour rarely if ever hold up
their hands at the first sound of gunfire. Moreover, the
power of the modern state is immense. I fear we are in for
much further grisly violence before the lesson is learned
through that most wonderful of political teachers, fear. But
eventually liberalism will fail because it is an unnatural
system of government. Then the liberals will do as the Nazis
did in 1945 and the Communists in 1990, lie low with their
spoils whilst trimming their sails to the new ideological
wind and trying to pretend that the immediate past was not
their child. But they will not change their spots. Those who
take their places in the political process must remain ever
vigilant.
return to top